On March 29th the Moscow subway system fell victim to a series of suicide bomber terrorist attacks. Two female bombers detonated bombs that killed 40 people and wounded another 80 at rush hour that morning. The attack has raised questions about how safe our American subways are what we need to do to increase security on them. Subways and buses (and major transportation infrastructure like bridges and tunnels) are of course convenient targets for terrorist attacks for the same reason that planes have been for so long. Transportation sources have been targets because large numbers of people congregate on them, making them unfortunately efficient for maximal impact. Moreover, transit is so essential to our consciousness and daily activity, yet something also small, that attacking it jars our very sense of security to the core because nothing feels safe when our means of movement is denied or destroyed.
However, it is notable that American subways have not been subject to a major attack, differentiating the U.S. from Spain, London, and Moscow. I do not think it has anything to do with our security measures in subways though. If a bomber wanted to access any American subway system all she would need is a fare. As long as we do and should prioritize speed and convenience of travel our public transportation systems will be incredibly permeable to attack. It is simply impractical to put people through any sort of rigorous security screening before entering a subway train. Moreover, to limit what people can bring on the subway is plain stupid as people rely on subways and buses in cities as residents in suburbs rely on cars.
What will keep us safe is reasonable police presence in our subway systems such that passengers feel safe and that perpetrators feel a reasonable chance of arousing suspicions of authorities. However, the only true way to keep passengers safe is the same system that applies to preventing any sort of terrorism, quality intelligence services and smart police working in concert. Fred Kaplan of Slate put it well when quoting Richard Clarke, the former White House Counterterrorism Chief:
Clarke has a few theories on why there haven’t been any suicide bombings here lately. “After 9/11,” he said, “all the security sweeps and the detentions left al-Qaida with the perception that it was very difficult to operate in the U.S.—more difficult than it actually was. Meanwhile, they found it was a lot easier to go after Americans in Iraq. They stopped going after the foreign enemy in the ‘far abroad.’ We came to them, so they went after us over there.”
That is not reassuring. Is it possible that the moment we leave Iraq and Afghanistan we will be susceptible to greater domestic attacks? Perhaps. Maybe at the same time without a military presence in the Middle East an attack will be less likely. This is all besides the point though. There is no perfect way to protect from a terrorist attack, especially on our mass transportation systems. We should concern ourselves with petty theft and assault and the day-to-day crimes and leave the concerns over national security to those who make that their full-time job.
April 14, 2010
Recessions are Cruel to Transit
Posted by meltzerm under Public Transportation, Railroads, Transportation Commentary, Transportation News | Tags: Chris Christie, Commuter Rail, Fare Hike, Garfield, Government services, Jon Corzine, Median Household Income, MTA, New Jersey Budget Deficit, New York Penn Station, NJ Transit, Paterson, Subways |1 Comment
Post #100 on the Transit Pass!
It is not news that economic downturns are particularly hard on transit, just like all government services. At the moment that affordable government services and assistance are most needed is also the time when government can least afford to provide them.
The voters of New Jersey reap what they sow. They dumped their CEO-governor Jon Corzine for the Republican challenger who promised the unattainable Holy Grail of New Jersey politics, lower property taxes. Now in office, Chris Christie has dealt with New Jersey’s budget deficit by cutting services and refusing to raise taxes, on anyone. Of course, when you don’t raise taxes you can still effectively tax many people by offering fewer governmental services. Therefore, Joe Millionaire is barely affected by the situation but Jane Minimum-Wage is put into an even more difficult situation because suddenly day care, transit, health care, etc. are less available and more expensive. Perhaps that is good politics for a Republican, but it is certainly bad governance.
Specifically, Christie has cut NJ Transit’s funding by 11%. In response, NJ Transit has been forced to raise fares; increasing the cost of local bus and light rail travel by 10% and commuter bus and train travel by a hefty 25%. I used NJ Transit’s commuter rail for a full year when I worked in New York. At that time my 35-40 minute ride cost $198 for a monthly pass. While most people in my hometown probably can absorb the 25% increase without too much difficulty. However, along the same route are a number of towns with poorer towns, such as Paterson (median 2000 household income: $32,778) and Garfield (median 2000 household income: $42,748), where the residents will have much greater difficulty absorbing such a fare hike.
A monthly pass from Paterson to New York Penn Station is currently $166. A 25% hike will bring that price to $207.50, or an extra $498 a year, and that does not even include the costs of a monthly pass for the bus or subway in New York City, given that most jobs are not within walking distance of Penn Station. With the price of a subway pass included a person from Paterson could be required to spend $3,450 a year for transit. That is simply outrageous when your household income is $32,778.
Governor Christie hasn’t lowered taxes, he has impaired the rights of people throughout the state to procure employment and provide effectively for their families. For the sake of saving some very wealthy residents the pain of having to pay a a little more in income tax the lower class has been implicitly taxed by virtue of being poor. Transit justice exists and this is not it. Governor Christie lacks that sense of empathy that Obama has been smeared for. He has prioritized the needs of suburban drivers over transit commuters, continuing our history of poor transit priorities.